Subject: Re: The future of NetBSD
To: Gilles Gravier <Gilles@gravier.org>
From: Jeff Rollin <jeff.rollin@gmail.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 08/31/2006 18:00:15
------=_Part_39524_187710.1157043615135
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 31/08/06, Gilles Gravier <Gilles@gravier.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Andy Ruhl wrote:
> >
> > The reason why apache and perl shouldn't be included is because they
> > are moving, 3rd party targets. They are better suited to pkgsrc.
> >
> And of course, GCC isn't... a moving 3rd party target?
>
> Gilles.


Good point. It's also licensed under that bad boy of the
we're-proprietary-but-we-want-to-appear-friendly-to-open-source world, the
General Public Licence.

Jeff.

------=_Part_39524_187710.1157043615135
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 31/08/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gilles Gravier</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:Gilles@gravier.org">Gilles@gravier.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>Andy Ruhl wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; The reason why apache and perl shouldn't be included is because they<br>&gt; are moving, 3rd party targets. They are better suited to pkgsrc.<br>&gt;<br>And of course, GCC isn't... a moving 3rd party target?
<br><br>Gilles.</blockquote><div><br>Good point. It's also licensed under that bad boy of the we're-proprietary-but-we-want-to-appear-friendly-to-open-source world, the General Public Licence.<br><br>Jeff.<br></div><br></div>
<br>

------=_Part_39524_187710.1157043615135--