Subject: Re: Problems with NAT
To: Rafael Almeida <almeidaraf@gmail.com>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rub=E9n_Gonz=E1lez_Arnau?= <ruben@cirdanetireth.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 08/29/2006 19:32:37
Hola Rafael,

Try to use static-port option in your nat.

Like this
nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0) static-port

Hope it helps.


> Hello,
>
> I've posted before in this same thread. I'm having trouble doing a
> port redirection in a nat. I redirect some ports for playing starcraft
> on a windows box, but the game gets very laggy when there's more than
> one person in the game, and my messages don't get to players other
> than the creator of the game. I used to have a linux box as a gateway
> and this iptables rule was enough to get everything working:
>
> /usr/sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 6112:6119 -i
> ppp0 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.3
>
> I've been told to use pf instead of ipf and ipnat. So I did a little
> reading and I was able to come up with the following pf.conf:
>
> ext_if="pppoe0"
> int_if="mtd0"
>
> scrub out all max-mss 1440
>
> nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0)
> rdr pass on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } to port 6112:6119 -> 192.168.0.3
> rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp to port 4662 -> 192.168.0.2
> rdr pass on $ext_if proto udp to port 4672 -> 192.168.0.2
>
> pass in all
> pass out all
>
> Note also that 4662 and 4672 are ports for emule. Surprisingly (at
> least to me), when I had
>
> rdr pppoe0 0.0.0.0/0 port 4672 -> 192.168.0.2 port 4672 udp
>
> on my ipnat.conf everything worked fine for the emule, but now it says
> that port is firewalled, even though I configured pf to send it back
> to my other computer.
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone who tries to help me with those
> configurations.
>
>