Subject: Re: Partitions
To: Andy Ball <andy.ball@earthlink.net>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 08/09/2006 20:16:46
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig6118F7A5A40D24F2C34784B5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy Ball wrote:
> Hello,
>
> At some point in the future, I hope to buy a mainboard with a
> supported hardware RAID controller. In the mean time, to get started
> I'm thinking of adding a (matched) pair of hard disk drives to an
> existing host, putting (unmirrored) /, swap and /usr partitions on the
> disks and then using using something like raidframe to make a mirror
> from two large partitions (one on each drive) that are the same size.
> Is it sensible to put / and /usr on one disk and swap on the other?
> Should I consider a third disk to keep swap away from the mirror?
> Hints, observations and suggestions are invited.
>
> Thanks,
> - Andy Ball
> =20
I generally take the easy way out, and mirror the entire drive, then
partition raid0. Then again, I'm lazy.
OTOH, if you want the machine to be able to keep running in the event of
a disk failure, you _should_ mirror swap.
+j
--------------enig6118F7A5A40D24F2C34784B5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRNqlKbOuUtxCgar5AQM1gAP/Wbn4jGvY25F2T6lPkMdIjfikkETJqJDE
rKrUWoqs/m/kNH3MBTgRdZoRXKlDyxmWtAXdNWhrQBqCbtQ02IdNc9V1iLVdi4ts
mt5MzGgoeqHSCHgJHjW5pbkM3IOissftevh69iqp2wei9NMdnn6zz4Z0AIoCk+Tk
0oinkGV5T3A=
=YI5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig6118F7A5A40D24F2C34784B5--