Subject: Re: pf not enabled in generic?
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: George Georgalis <george@galis.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 06/27/2006 08:42:12
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:23:28PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:02:23 -0400, "George Georgalis" <george@galis.org>
>wrote:
>
>> This doesn't make sence to me...
>> isn't pf configured in generic?
>> 
>>  root@dev:/root # pfctl -e 
>> pfctl: /dev/pf: Device not configured
>>  root@dev:/root # uname -a 
>> NetBSD dev 3.0 NetBSD 3.0 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Dec 19 01:04:02 UTC 2005  builds@works.netbsd.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-0-RELEASE/i386/200512182024Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-0-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
>> 
>> What else do I need to do?
>
>Add
>
>	pseudo-device  pf                      # PF packet filter
>
>and probably
>
>	pseudo-device  pflog                   # PF log if
>
>to your kernel config file.

thanks, not sure why I was convinced they where enabled in GENERIC.
Guess I was thinking about pfctl &c in base.

// George

-- 
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <IXOYE><