Subject: Re: pf not enabled in generic?
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: George Georgalis <george@galis.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 06/27/2006 08:42:12
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:23:28PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:02:23 -0400, "George Georgalis" <george@galis.org>
>wrote:
>
>> This doesn't make sence to me...
>> isn't pf configured in generic?
>>
>> root@dev:/root # pfctl -e
>> pfctl: /dev/pf: Device not configured
>> root@dev:/root # uname -a
>> NetBSD dev 3.0 NetBSD 3.0 (GENERIC) #0: Mon Dec 19 01:04:02 UTC 2005 builds@works.netbsd.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-0-RELEASE/i386/200512182024Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-3-0-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC i386
>>
>> What else do I need to do?
>
>Add
>
> pseudo-device pf # PF packet filter
>
>and probably
>
> pseudo-device pflog # PF log if
>
>to your kernel config file.
thanks, not sure why I was convinced they where enabled in GENERIC.
Guess I was thinking about pfctl &c in base.
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <IXOYE><