Subject: Re: cpio header field too small?
To: Ben Collver <collver@peak.org>
From: Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher <stefan@net-tex.de>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 06/27/2006 09:49:23
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Also sprach Ben Collver (collver@peak.org)
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:32:19PM +0200, Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher=
wrote:
> > Also sprach khym@azeotrope.org (khym@azeotrope.org)
> I don't think dump counts as an archiver. =20
What is it than?
> It only works with ffs/lfs,
> and the manual states that it only works reliably on an unmounted
> filesystem.
dump is also the most reliable archiver on mounted filesystem, it is
really hard to get a non-working dump. That's nothing one could say
about tar/pax/cpio. If one has to archive an active filesystem, fss(4)=20
should be used.=20
--=20
PGP FPR: CF74 D5F2 4871 3E5C FFFE 0130 11F4 C41E B3FB AE33
--=20
http://www.net-tex.de
http://www.cryptomancer.de
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFEoOMDEfTEHrP7rjMRAtSxAJ4wgbK23vJFpHxkxNdiSh4RbpVqgACeMVbT
hpXpVWs1RL4BIvva8G/xu84=
=Y1IA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--