Subject: Re: Really quick 'cvs update' & build question
To: Mark Cullen <mark.r.cullen@gmail.com>
From: Brian A. Seklecki <lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 06/18/2006 23:02:19
> they were sets from 3.0-RELEASE, the tags in the tree are for
> 3.0-RELEASE, and running a plain `cvs update -Pd` just gets, well,
> 3.0-RELEASE! So, in order to update the tree to 3.0.1, is it ok to do a
> `cvs update -Pd -r netbsd-3-0`
BTW, this will get you to the HEAD of the 3.x branch which is
"3.0_STABLE". Some CVS tags are "sticky" once set, so that may describe
the behavior you're seeing. Check /usr/src/CVS/Tag
> , or should I be doing a 'checkout'?