Subject: Re: Lynx in base system?
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Paulo Aukar <ptaaukar@terra.com.br>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 03/26/2006 15:57:51
--Multipart_Sun__26_Mar_2006_15_57_51_-0300_slQGEZFBf=fX+fLb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
claudio` <ilfoglionascosto@netcat.it> wrote:
> I vote to NOT including lynx to the base system.
Individual or local needs suggests the production of individualized bootable isos. For example: I "need" sudo, adjustkernel (and perl), lynx, git, extipl, screen, unzip and syssrc.tgz to setup xdmcp terminals in dual boot (very old) machines (windows/netbsd). Of course this is only one out of many alternatives. All that stuff can be found in a directory "tools" created under i386/installation (the case is an i386 machine).
Paulo
--Multipart_Sun__26_Mar_2006_15_57_51_-0300_slQGEZFBf=fX+fLb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=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--Multipart_Sun__26_Mar_2006_15_57_51_-0300_slQGEZFBf=fX+fLb--