Subject: Re: NetBSD's swap partition ID
To: Zbigniew Baniewski <email@example.com>
From: Johnny Billquist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/25/2006 00:14:49
The "additional complication" is DOS, BIOS and MBR, not the BSD
disklabels. (And of course other PC-centric operating systems, which
implements the same DOS partition table.)
NetBSD have a disklabel on every disk, same no matter what hardware.
It's just that on a PC there might be some other software that expects
another type of partition table, and that's where you get the additional
So NetBSD can live with that. It don't really care about the MBR
partition table, but the BSD disk label, and partitions can be placed so
that the MBR don't get clobbered. As others have pointed out, the BSD
disklabel still covers the whole disk. It's the other systems that need
to be told that there is a NetBSD partition on the disk, so that they
don't clobber it. NetBSD really don't care about the MBR partition
table. It is not used.
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:41:23AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>my opinion is that on an i386 one should use the fdisk partition table to
>>make life easier.
> My problem was, that I wanted to have 3 OS-es on the disk: FreeDOS, Linux
> (together with swap it makes 2 more partitions), and NetBSD.
> Yes, I was able to use disklabel - although I can't understand the
> benefits(?) of such additional complication. What for? Just because a long
> time ago in such way it was made on the PDP-11?
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: email@example.com || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol