Subject: Re: Really bad performance when doing newfs
To: Jeff Rizzo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andy Ruhl <email@example.com>
Date: 02/03/2006 05:05:18
On 2/2/06, Jeff Rizzo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> What newfs command line did you use? Were you using the block device
> instead of the raw, by any chance?
It was the block device... I thought newfs chose the raw device no matter w=
> You could also newfs it as UFS2; it goes faster. Though, I certainly
> wouldn't expect a 6 hour newfs.
I'm not sure that I need UFS2? Is there any drawback to using it? I
figured regular old UFS was the default for a reason...