Subject: Re: NetBSD and the Google "Summer of Code" Summary
To: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
From: Matthias Buelow <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/17/2005 18:42:36
Jan Schaumann wrote:
> BPG, the BSD Privacy Guard, is a BSD-licensed program that
> performs authentication and encryption using the OpenPGP standard
> (RFC 2440). The BPG project's goals were to produce:
> * A set of libraries for signing and encrypting data, allowing the
> integration of OpenPGP features in other applications.
What is the rationale behind this? I assume you are aware of entry #4.16
in the GnuPG FAQ, "Can't we have a gpg library?"?
While I don't know the whole argumentation against a PGP library, one
(imho) strong argument is that a library would load the decrypted secret
key into any random application's memory that uses pgp functionality
(like a mail reader), while with a separate pgp/gpg binary, it will
reside only in the address space of the pgp/gpg program, which has been
designed (and carefully checked/hardened) for this situation.