Subject: Re: seriousness of this Project
To: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 09/07/2005 22:08:19
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> An: Zafer Aydogan <email@example.com>
> Kopie: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Betreff: Re: seriousness of this Project
> Datum: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:29:44 +0200
> I had a quick look at the www mail archives and it's hard to tell what
> the current state is - Zafer, you sent tons of nits to fix, is any of
> that still open? I guess the most productive way would be to summarize
> the open issues to www@NetBSD.org.
I wasn't complaining about the PR's I opened. I was talking about the
Feedback Form on the Frontside, where I'm sending in Comments, Mispelling
Errors, Dead Links, etc.etc.
I was saying that the Documents on the Website are not up to date.
I was saying, for anyone new who visits the Website, that it does not
deliver sufficient information.
I was talking about representation and presentation of NetBSD. (PR)
I don't want to sum up all things that bother me here, but for an OS
going into the third Version, I think, the website should at least provide
an up to date FAQ.
And yes, I understand you Rui. I don't care about the Mirror List discussion
anyway since it is not updated since years. That wasn't my Point.
Has anybody (except J. Reed) read my inital Post ?
I know that this is a volunteer work for everyone.
But obvious Errors (like mispellings, dead links, corrected links), that are
reported (for example by me), should be fixed, especially, when I see that
commits to htdocs are done almost everyday, only discarding reports.
Anyway, maybe I should mail directly to email@example.com instead of using the