Subject: Re: ipf: keep state on udp for low port numbers?
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Florian Stoehr <netbsd@wolfnode.de>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 07/17/2005 00:53:17 
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Florian Stoehr wrote:

> 16/07/2005 21:24:41.436914 rtk0 @0:2 p 10.0.2.10,955 -> 10.0.0.1,111 PR udp 
> 16/07/2005 21:24:41.438634 rtk0 @0:4 b 10.0.2.1,111 -> 10.0.2.10,955 PR udp

:(

ok, ipf is right, ansering from a differen address really shouldn't work.

sorry for the noise.

-Florian