--iUdyFHenu1vPh/Ml
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 01:23:54AM +0200, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 01:05:42PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> > From where I stand there is no good reason to stick with netbsd-2-0
> > unless you're in a production environment, since it sees almost no
> > bug fixes.
>=20
> Really? Should netbsd-2 branch be considered as kind of "abandonware"?

netbsd-2 !=3D netbsd-2-0

please see http://NetBSD.org/Releases/release-map.html for details.


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--iUdyFHenu1vPh/Ml
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCvJZuiwjDDlS8cmMRAjPCAKCI7CwmEaS21t157ft1UiAxPlnx4gCePVA0
itiRIVCKyq9WpTZHUpHZpfE=
=w82g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iUdyFHenu1vPh/Ml--