Subject: Re: Bad sectors vs RAIDframe
To: Stephen Borrill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Brownlee <abs@NetBSD.org>
Date: 06/08/2005 18:14:50
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Stephen Borrill wrote:
[...raidframe failing when both disks in a RAID1 set suffer bad sectors..]
> This is happening far too often for me now though (just had another failure
> of 2 discs - this time 250GB). These are all with 1.6.2 machines, so it would
> be great to come up with a plan to minimise future problems. Especially as
> these are at (generally clueless) customer sites.
> My plan is to hurry forward the migration to 2.0.2 from 1.6.2 and to run a
> nightly check which will email both the customer and ourselves if it spots
> any failed components.
Another potential stopgap option might be to ask Greg if
he could produce a patchset for 1.6.2 for the 'stop raidframe
failing last component' change. I would imagine some form
of bribe might make that option more viable.
For future reference there is definite mileage in mixing brands.
Out of curiosity are you providing the customers with any form
of remote backups? I've played around with a few options and
settled on rsnapshot which does nearly exactly what I want, and
is very reasonable in disk space cost.
David/absolute -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --