Subject: Re: pkgsrc branch vs. current?
To: None <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 05/10/2005 14:20:49
In message <20050510180513.GA16340@netmeister.org>, Jan Schaumann writes:
>
>
>"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>=20
>> But they aren't always there. For example, for a while -- a few weeks, I
>> think -- the head has had a fixed ImageMagick, 6.2.2.0. But pkgsrc-2005Q1
>> has 6.2.0.4, which has a heap overflow. I've seen other examples in=20
>> the past.
>
>Whenever this happens and you notice it, please send a message to the
>developer who committed the fix to pkgsrc HEAD to request a pullup.
>Developers should do so anyway, but it's easy to forget, and without
>pullup requests, pkgsrc-releng can't, well, pull up the change.
As a metanote, it would be really good to have a page on "how to get
the project to do X", for many values of X. Sometimes, when there's a
missing feature or package, the right answer is "do you have the time?"
But when it's something like a pull-up or an old version of some
software in pkgsrc or what have you, it isn't clear. "Send a PR" is
another good answer, but it's no always the right one.
--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb