--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:50:57PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:20:08AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 01:01:09AM +0000, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > >=20
> > > ... and then you can do the update normally.  E.g.:
> > >=20
> > > 	cvs -z3 update -A -I! > /var/tmp/src.cvs.log &
> >=20
> > Please stop telling people to use cvs -z.  It has a significant negative
> > performance impact on the cvs server *and* it's buggy, which imposes a
> > high administrative cost.  We have asked users of our CVS servers to not
> > use -z for many years now.
>=20
> Over dialup 'cvs update' is stupendously slow without -z3.

Well, but if it is broken, it doesn't help, right? You wouldn't write
your backups to /dev/null only because it's faster?

Regards,
	-is

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBQn8NuzCn4om+4LhpAQHgBwf7BM1T41mMmwjzuDPJg8HN4RMCiL9UnFmq
tNvznDwvWIxM0lgFcannWKIrHX3HogzjRL16Y1qgcirpEpw06J/+gpFLQA1lvsP3
oTDs3G0T/XS/T0V9emIHK/CoIaIdV+u12DCijcb5YyZJIK1Z0QI/e1p8f+zQbWyV
PKyIvo28rlOuLj8wEc++T3W2efqGZTGcT5CNlcWXp0H9iUDfBNtDn6coEr36gBfQ
rdkLieOtxCzvD0urvGe8smK/lxcNvu30mBxU4j0YvxkG3mHt0DGEqEXdrR7M18bZ
DgQM7CQGIgVth8oV9flS9l8QuxvFXrWlq0eWOm2i9ga/u3WX5+lPsw==
=iL22
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--