Subject: Re: raidframe diagnosis - how to recover from read error w/o disk replacement
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Aaron J. Grier <agrier@poofygoof.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 05/05/2005 21:32:51
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:29:24PM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
> Ya.. it's just annoying when it works so well that you don't notice
> the problem :-} (been there, done that...) I believe the 'daily'
> scripts (at least for 3.0) now check for failed RAID devices, and
> there is at least some indication to the operator that something has
> gone wrong...
this changed from 1.6.x to 2.0... and whoever made the change I thank
profusely. I had a 1.5.x system with a dead drive in a raid set which
I didn't catch for some six months after the incident. (of course the
machine remained continuously up before and after...)
--
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@poofygoof.com