On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:00:29PM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> It needed a stdarg fix to make it stop segv-ing on an amd64

This part I don't understand - why would it segv with the old code? Looks
like a amd64 library bug to me, can you create a simple test that reproduces
it and file a PR?

> (The second patched file was just
> something that seemed needlessly obtuse and I was worried it was being
> miscompiled.)

Nit: the ! operator will always return 0 or 1

Martin