Subject: Re: -key "introduction"
To: Zbigniew Baniewski <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christopher W. Richardson <email@example.com>
Date: 03/29/2005 17:49:12
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Zbigniew Baniewski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 05:15:59PM -0500, Christopher W. Richardson wrote:
>> As near as I can now tell, the "problem" is that wsksymdef.h does not
>> define 0x01-0x07, and Zbigniew would like to be able to assign 0x04 to a
> But not found any yet; and, asking for more info, I made kind
> of proposal for fixing this. I suppose, to have different
> actions made by two different keys (never mind their names),
> shouldn't take changes in the source code made by the user,
> recompilation and so on.
I thought we had already established that they _do_ have
different actions (^H and ^?). At least, they do for me, even on
console, on i386 2.0.2. I thought that the remaining issue was
the _specific_ different behavior. If you're really seeing them
both issue ^H (or ^?), then maybe you need to stty erase undef?
Just guessing, as I don't think the rest of us are seeing this
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----