Subject: Re: -key "introduction"
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@Update.UU.SE>
From: Christopher W. Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/29/2005 17:20:38
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
email@example.com (Christopher W. Richardson) writes:
> I guess the remaining questions are:
> 1) Do we have a good reason for not having included ASCII
> (ISO Latin1) NUL, SOH, STX, ETX, EOT (this is the one
> he's after), ENQ, ACK, and BEL in our ASCII (ISO
> Latin1) KeySym declaration; and,
> 2) If the answer to 1 is "no", do we want to include
> any/all of those in an upcomming release.
Apologies for not having brought this up in that last response,
but, assuming that those _are_ the outstanding questions, should
we now move this to tech-userlevel?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----