Subject: Re: LFS (was Thank you NetBSD)
To: None <email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Dieter <email@example.com>
Date: 02/24/2005 22:28:28
> I think there is only one solution to prevent file system damage: Make
> sure that power will not fail, never.
Power can and will fail. Even with a UPS. :-(
> This is also the reason why "good"
> hardware RAID systems have a NV write cache... Not to talk about the
> on-disk write back cache... Especially the later can make it really hard
> to guarantee data integrity. Even for FFS1 and softdeps. (AFAIK)
In reading this thread, it sounds like FFS is the preferred FS for avoiding
data loss on *BSD. I only recall losing data once in many years with
NetBSD's FFS, a great improvement over previous BSD based systems.
If one is forced to run Linux :-( which FS is the least likely
to lose data, and how much worse is it than NetBSD's FFS?