Subject: Re: Jan 19...
To: TLorD <tld@tld.digitalcurse.com>
From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/26/2005 10:33:52
TLorD wrote:
> Just my thought: why signed 32 bit values? Unsigned should buy something
> like
> 100 more years, and I don't think many programs use negative values (but I
> might be very wrong)
time(3) (and a number other functions that return time_t) returns -1 as
an error condition. And time(3) is a standard C function, so it can't
just be changed.
Apart from that, I seriously hope that in 30+ years, we won't be using
C-based operating systems anymore but I'm rather sure that I will be
disappointed...
mkb.