Subject: Re: Jan 19...
To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de>
From: TLorD <tld@tld.digitalcurse.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/26/2005 10:03:46
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Buelow wrote:
| Florian Stoehr wrote:
|> time_t still 32 bits on many platforms (and I *think* many programs
|> assume sizeof(int) == sizeof(time_t), thus will break if someone
|> moves that to 64 bit).
| Is it a problem when a couple programs break? One could still provide
| compatibility libs for those.
Just my thought: why signed 32 bit values? Unsigned should buy something like
100 more years, and I don't think many programs use negative values (but I
might be very wrong)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFB91zyMiWEUf7YMGERArITAKDOuazun5/znLMolSXRYaTMGsfclgCfSJPi
TpxXXlSEAsYCypYS2ai0BE4=
=085/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----