On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +0100, Hauke Fath wrote:
> Strange priorities in sysinst -- I'd choose LFS support (and commandline
> editing, and localised keyboard mappings, if there is any room left on
> the media) over eye candy like localised installer text any day.

You know how it works - send in patches ;-)

Someone did with localized installer texts, but noone did for keyboard
mappings (which in deed we urgently need).

IIUC lfs support is in the work, but that's something you need to test
carefully - and testing sysinst is not everyones idea of fun.

Martin