--L4gFVV/CladpyON8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:57:17PM -0500, Louis Guillaume wrote:
  | But getting back to the real question...
  |=20
  | I'm still curious about filesystem size limitations for NetBSD.
  |=20
  | (let's lower the bar)
  |=20
  | Given a 1TB filesystem (I think its "giant"), served up via AFP, CIFS=
=20
  | and NFS to ~600 simultaneous users from a NetBSD 2.0 server,  what is=
=20
  | better/more mature/more stable - LFS or FFSv2?

I'd avoid both and use FFSv1.
LFS is still flaky for "real" data.
FFSv2 has twice metadata overhead and you don't need that for less
than 2TB file systems.


  | Are there other options for NetBSD? ext3fs? jfs? xfs?

Unfortunately, not at this time.

--L4gFVV/CladpyON8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFB7RQ/pBhtmn8zJHIRAulzAKDKKsN7TFL7Q8UbalpacNKJGj0VXACgwZZD
AhPT8uwVr2dqmzJ7p7hKYgg=
=9nR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--L4gFVV/CladpyON8--