Peter I. Hansen a écrit :

> Asmodehn Shade wrote:
>
>> Peter I. Hansen a écrit :
>>
>>> Asmodehn Shade wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter I. Hansen a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Asmodehn Shade wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm just trying to build postfix with sasl and tls enabled to 
>>>>>> build my own mail server...
>>>>>> I build it from pkgsrc 2004Q4.
>>>>>> But the build fails on a patch and said : 
>>>>>> ========================================================================== 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of the selected build options and/or local patches may be 
>>>>>> incompatible.
>>>>>> Please try building with fewer options or patches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ========================================================================== 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can someone explain me what's the matter here ??
>>>>>> Did someone try this on pkgsrc current ? Where did I miss 
>>>>>> something ?
>>>>>> Do I actually need sasl AND tls ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I did the build about a week ago with these line in /etc/mk.conf
>>>>>
>>>>> USE_SASL2=YES
>>>>> PKG_OPTIONS.postfix=bdb pcre sasl tls
>>>>>
>>>>> What options did you set exactly?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just a little question : Wich NetBSD version do you have ?
>>>>
>>>> Because I also got a little problem with pureftpd, it seems options 
>>>> are not well understood...
>>>> Perhaps this is a problem with the pkgsrc system...
>>>> I use a NetBSD 2.0, the iso release, and I rebuilt the kernel for 
>>>> my own computer, but I didnt reinstall the whole release... I've 
>>>> seen a 2.0.1 is out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just rebuildt postfix with the before mentioned options. I use 
>>> NetBSD 2.0 (the iso release), the GENERIC kernel and pkgsrc updated 
>>> yesterday with sup.
>>> I get no errors. One thing about your output is that you fail on 
>>> patch-aj. This is an inet6 only patch, which i don't use. I looked 
>>> it up on 
>>> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/mail/postfix/patches/Attic/patch-aj 
>>>
>>> and this file is now removed. I guess you are experiencing PR/28756 
>>> http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=28756
>>>
>>> When did you last update pkgsrc? You can find directions on how to 
>>> do this at 
>>> http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/pkgsrc/getting.html#id2534807
>>>
>>> -Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> This is exactly 28756... but I use the 2004Q4 pkgsrc branch, as it is 
>> supposed to be the stable one... I suppose this has been only fixed 
>> in pkgsrc current, isn't it ?
>> If this is working, why not change the pkgsrc stable branch too ?
>>
>
> As far as I have understood (I have been wrong before), pkgsrc is 
> branched about 4 times a year to provide a stable basis upon which the 
> developers can build binary packages.
> I install most things from pkgsrc, which I update with sup about once 
> a week or if I spot an update for something important to me on 
> http://netbsd.org/Changes/pkg-changes.html
>
> -Peter


Few years before I thought the same but it seems that pkgsrc have one stable and one current branch now ^^, if I understood well...
And I think this is really better.
On my home server, I don't want to test last features, or just new packages, but I want good packages which build without any problem.
There are sometimes problems on current branch...

I just spot this out :

+ continuing engineering on the "stable" branches of pkgsrc has been
much improved

from this : http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2004/12/21/0005.html

I actually hope this will be fixed in 2004Q4.



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.11 - Release Date: 12/01/2005