Subject: Re: fs corruption with raidframe (again)
To: Greg Oster <oster@cs.usask.ca>
From: David Maxwell <david@crlf.net>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/12/2005 10:25:21
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Greg Oster wrote:
> Louis Guillaume writes:
> > 1. run memtest86:
> > I ran this through only one iteration of the default
> > tests. (didn't have time to go through all)
> > Result - 100% passed.
>
> Good. hopefully we can ignore memory issues.
I have no reason to highlight memory issues here - I just want to point
out that a single pass of even the extensive tests isn't enough to rule
out memory issues. Some of them are very situation specific, because a
flaw on one signal line may only show up under certain data
transitions...
--
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net -->
"Maxwell's Maxim: Sturgeon's Law fails where one person has a bullwhip
and isn't afraid to use it" - Martin Loeffler