Subject: Re: fs benchmark poll
To: Zafer Aydogan <zafer@gmx.org>
From: Ben Collver <collver@peak.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 01/03/2005 07:02:42
Hello Zafer,
You might want to:
* use a release tarfile, as the -current one is constantly changing.
this will make comparisons with other people's results more controlled
* use identical hardware when comparing different operating systems.
* specify what filesystem you compared ffs to. (ext3? reiserfs? etc)
Cheers,
Ben
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:54:59PM +0100, Zafer Aydogan wrote:
> Hello Newsgroup !
>
> Is our Filesystem (FFS) slow ?
>
> I did some sort of benchmark with taking the time that is needed to unpack
> the current pkgsrc.tar.gz.
>
> This is the Command I used:
> date > date.txt && tar xvfz pkgsrc.tar.gz && date >> date.txt
>
> This are the Results (all i386):
> 114 Seconds on a 1.6.1 ffs + softdeps on 120 GB ide Harddisk
> 219 Seconds on a 2.99.10 ffs + softdeps on a 40 GB HDD
> 185 Seconds on a 2.0E ffs with a 120 Raid 1 HDD
> 30 Seconds on a SuSE Linux 8.2 with scsi
> 30 Seconds on a SuSE Linux 8.1 with scsi