On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:42:35PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >We go from a 3-digit numbering scheme to a 2-digit, but it
> >doesn't change anything because one of the 3 digit was never changed
> 
> We seems to have a different opinion on that. :-)
> I've been through three different first digits while using NetBSD.

No there was only the 0.x serie, and the 1.x serie (and 1.0 was after 0.9,
so the first digit bump didn't have any special meanings).

> And *then* they changed the numbering scheme, and went to a two-number 
> scheme.

No, it's called 2.0 *because* the numbering scheme was changed. Otherwise
it would have been 1.7.

--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
     NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--