Subject: Re: netbsd-2-0-RELEASE
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Richard Rauch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/01/2004 22:43:05
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:53:06PM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Richard Rauch wrote:
> > Some might not have cut it just yet. Others might have cut it long
> > ago.
> Most of the developers have mixed feelings toward both parts, but at some
This doesn't surprise me. Developers are people, too.
> point the releng team had to make the call to go with it; for good or bad,
> it's a milestone that can be used to prepare for the next bug-patch release.
> > But it's not our call to say
> > when to release it and in half a year we should have a 2.1
> As a nitpick: The version numbering scheme has changed with 2.0. Yeah,
I konw. I am refering to the first patch-release for 2.0---namely, 2.1. (^&
People can argue that they want more delays for the 2.1 patch release, just
as they are arguing that they want more delays for the bug-fixes in 2.0
now. (2.0's feature set was frozen some time ago, yes?)
I expect that 3.0 will be more than 6 months away, unless the release schedule
is *really* being ramped up.
"I probably don't know what I'm talking about." http://www.olib.org/~rkr/