Subject: Re: 2.0rc4 unstability
To: SODA Noriyuki <>
From: Jukka Marin <>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/18/2004 13:49:20
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 08:47:08PM +0900, SODA Noriyuki wrote:
> "show uvm" in the DDB prompt?

Current UVM status:
  pagesize=4096 (0x1000), pagemask=0xfff, pageshift=12
  256743 VM pages: 160046 active, 80047 inactive, 1041 wired, 21 free
  min  10% (25) anon, 0% (0) file, 5% (12) exec
  max  80% (204) anon, 1% (2) file, 30% (76) exec
  pages  169933 anon, 66562 file, 15294 exec
  freemin=64, free-target=85, inactive-target=80031, wired-max=85581
  faults=1728895, traps=964197, intrs=471337, ctxswitch=9383006
  softint=508212, syscalls=337442323, swapins=5, swapouts=129
  fault counts:
    noram=0, noanon=0, pgwait=0, pgrele=0
    ok relocks(total)=2848(2848), anget(retrys)=1287692(0), amapcopy=11544
    neighbor anon/obj pg=21694/242895, gets(lock/unlock)=70080/2848
    cases: anon=1242023, anoncow=10629, obj=59549, prcopy=10531, przero=235754
  daemon and swap counts:
    woke=4306144, revs=238, scans=630112, obscans=65014, anscans=0
    busy=1576, freed=0, reactivate=429249, deactivate=730310
    pageouts=0, pending=0, nswget=0
    nswapdev=1, nanon=1289205, nanonneeded=1289205 nfreeanon=1130738
    swpages=1048575, swpginuse=0, swpgonly=0 paging=0

> According to the backtrace, this is really similar to the problem
> described in the PR kern/26908.
> Have you applied the patch in the PR?

Not yet.  I thought I'd see if I get the same panic first.