On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 03:44:29PM +0200, Henrik Edlund wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Ja'far Railton wrote:
> 
> JR> Demons may be more ambiguous but the present symbol is really a
> JR> cartoon Devil, let's be honest. Bad is what the Devil represents,
> JR> isn't it? Some people _like_ being bad, but is it really such a good
> JR> image for a serious, mature product? In any case, let no one be under
> JR> any illusions - at the end of the day it's "the great and good" who
> JR> will make the decision.
> 
> It probably depends on your religion (or lack thereof), ethics, morale,
> culture and so on if you see a cartoon devil as good or bad. There is
> impossible to classify it as bad as a fact. That would be to impose your
> own standards onto others.

What a wonderful bikeshed discussion! :)

> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>  safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> 	-- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

"They that can give up essential daemons to obtain a little temporary
political correctness deserve neither BSD nor popularity..."

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/