Subject: Re: cluster waste?
To: NetBSD Users <netbsd-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 03/18/2004 15:12:07
--AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:04:07AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> Has anyone revalidated those numbers for modern disks? When FFS first=20
> came out, there was a lot of talk about rotational optimizations,=20
> staying within the cylinder, etc. Nowadays, of course, that's all=20
> mythical. =20
Different problem, I think. As far as I recall, the "find block" algorithm
uses a hash function, and thus gets ineffective if the table is too full.
I don't know whether the 4.4BSD cylinder group design affects this.
-is
--AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQEVAgUBQFmuNDCn4om+4LhpAQGYLQgAnyKbQlUKjP1bQCZQD0erpg+FOR4VbhOr
S74kMED4rYBYByTcx2g4zQCcANIboFlc3s4L4SV/b62tOqrKUlGWJnYs4ofgdTFF
Tbt6MeNKka3kDad12bk/Z7Ze82hgPYN3LVTFT8Pk31QGLalZI/XJNpukHBC+rum5
Z7q5DK6RgwA/6c9+fUgxOVs6wksBWEkykSgMpEquoql1H744os8UbDUiS5YEwGeK
u4muN299YZYteeo+eiDpy2TS/AxrmFrMwMOH45t4klZH5q6aYPAixvP4VW2gKYHN
OaBs4S1x9eKMfOpeB0B/GOoSZPxaHORzarS5EZLmQ4oo33cpTXpUYg==
=auC6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW--