Subject: Re: is mozilla very slow on alpha, or is mozilla-gtk2 slow everywhere?
To: NetBSD User's Discussion List <netbsd-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Christian Biere <christianbiere@gmx.de>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 03/01/2004 15:42:37
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I finally got mozilla-gtk2-1.6nb2 to build, install, and run on my
> alpha, but I find it deathly slow. Netscape-4.6 was faster on my
> ancient 486sx25!
Well, Mozilla *is* very slow compared to Netscape 4.x. Fix a couple
of bugs in Netscape, add tabbed browsing I'll happily never use
Mozilla again. OTOH, people keep saying The-Browser-Which-Changes-
Its-Name-With-Every-Release is light-weight(?!). *shudder*
> It takes over a minute of CPU time for mozilla just to put up the
> profile selector, and another 50 CPU seconds to fetch and render the
> default home page. That's a hell of a lot of CPU cycles.
Does the kernel automagically correct alignment errors? This would
explain your problems. I didn't use GCC to build Mozilla for Alpha
and GCC causes pretty funky effects if there are any alignment
errors e.g., not causing a SIGBUS but leaving a loop too early or
so.
It could also be a problem with Pango the font library for GTK+ 2.x.
Maybe your fontcache is messed. Try to remove or re-create it. You
could also try to set GTK_USE_XFT=3D0 in the shell environment.
=20
> So, is mozilla just very slow on alpha, or is mozilla-gtk2 slow
> everywhere?
GTK+ 2.x is certainly not faster than GTK+ 1.2.x anywhere. I wouldn't
use it for Mozilla. Or, what's the benefit? GTK+ 1.2.x is deprecated
but it works fine with Mozilla.
> Sadly the '-install' option (for my 8-bit NCD HMX display) doesn't seem
> to be working completely either (images and icons are fuzzy even though
> a private colour-map is allocated and used).
Have you tried '--no-xshm'? At least, GTK+ 1.2.x had problems with
using the shared memory extension with X.
--=20
Christian
=20
As you can see, this a signature. It's not related to the contents of the
mail in any way. But you probably won't listen to me anyway, will you?
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAQ0vd0KQix3oyIMcRAh/UAJ9XcYDXJw3RdEVGM1GWNBEDk4DrKQCbBoyP
mN/R95+YqulJKEtmabngIds=
=oB0n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--