Subject: Re: CVS or CVSUP or rsync or what?
To: None <NetBSD-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 02/11/2004 14:28:25
--7JrJW0wW5qTeyr+Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:45:52PM -0500, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
| Congrats on the new CVS server...
|=20
| A question...
| What is the preferred way for mere users to get sources
| on a regular basis?
|=20
| I know CVS beats on the server a bit. Is rsync better? cvsup?
anoncvs.NetBSD.org is a separate machine to cvs.NetBSD.org.
As an end-user, using anonymous cvs to anoncvs.NetBSD.org
is a fine solution. rsync often causes _more_ server load
due to its directory access pattern.
Cheers,
Luke.
--7JrJW0wW5qTeyr+Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAKaFZpBhtmn8zJHIRAhOHAJ9R8RGi6dVayNaF8d7KVnt6Q5TDzQCbB7N0
ZOkcf7o9Egahdl8GZM2Rtcg=
=t1xV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JrJW0wW5qTeyr+Y--