Subject: AnyBody worked with TSB43AB22 FireWire OHCI chip
To: Rishabh Kumar Goel <rishabh@soc-soft.com>
From: Gerald C. Simmons <simmons@darykon.cet.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 11/03/2003 20:46:41
This is a Texas Instruments 400Mb Firewire controller.
Was our OHCI driver checked out on the TSB43AB22?
Maybe there is some subtle difference in the way NEC implemented IEEE1394a-2000
that is different than the TI chip.
I don't see any PCI Firewire controllers listed in supported H/W on the website.
OHCI or otherwise.
Gerry Simmons
simmons@darykon.cet.com
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a TSB43AB22 FireWire PCI controller card. I m trying get my FireWire
> HDD workable on NetBSD. Though the ohci driver is fine with NEC OHCI
> chip(72873) but it stucks with TSB43AB22 Card.
>
> ________Dmesg________
> sbpscsi0 at fwnode0fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 1, key 0x0, 0xf0010004,
> 0x0
>
> scsibus0 at sbpscsi0: 1 target, 1 lun per target
> Called sbpscsi_scsipi_request
> Got req_run_xfer
> xs control: 0x000001c4, timeout: 10000
> opcode: 0x00
> 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
> Alloc'ing more orbs
> fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010008, 0x0
> fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 1, key 0x0, 0xf001000c, 0x0
> fwohci_at_output: tcode 0x1, tlabel 0x37 hlen 16, dlen 8
> 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000$
> 00000000 f0010008$
> fwohci_at_output: desc 24
> 02000010 00000000 00000000 00000000 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000
> 103c0008 00535b30 00000000 00000000
> fwohci1: intmask=0x00000001: ReqTxComplete(0x8052)
> fwohci1: intmask=0x00000030: RQPkt(0x8452) RSPkt(0x9451)
> fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010010, 0x0
> fwohci_handler_set: ctx 2, tcode 5, key 0x0, 0xf0010014, 0x0
> fwohci_event_thread: intmask 00000031 ReqTxComp RQPkt RSPkt
> fwohci_at_done: desc 24 (3)
> 02000010 00000000 00000000 00000000 0002dd10 ffc0ffff f0030000 00080000
> 103c0008 00535b30 00000000 8452c799
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 0, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 36
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 4, req 4096, res 4060, len 8, avail 32
> fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0xe, tlabel=0x0, hlen=12, dlen=0
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 12, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 24
> fwohci_phy_input: BusReset: 0x00010000
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 16, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 20
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 20, req 4096, res 4060, len 12, avail 16
> fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0x5, tlabel=0x16, hlen=16, dlen=0
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 32, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 4
>
> sbp2_login_ans: (addr): (0x80053d4c)
> fwohci_at_output: tcode 0x7, tlabel 0x16 hlen 16, dlen 32
> 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000$
> 00000000 00000000 00000000 f001000c 90400000 00000010 00000000 f0010004$
> fwohci_at_output: desc 24
> 02000010 00000000 00000000 000031d6 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000
> 103c0020 00cb3c00 00000000 00000000
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 0, off 36, req 4096, res 4060, len 4, avail 0
> fwohci1: intmask=0x00000002: RespTxComplete(0x8051)
> fwohci_buf_input: no input for 2
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1068, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 16
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1072, req 4096, res 3012, len 8, avail 12
> fwohci_buf_input: tcode=0x2, tlabel=0x37, hlen=12, dlen=0
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1080, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 4
> fwohci_arrs_input: tcode 0x2, from 0xffc0, tlabel 0x37, rcode 0x0, hlen 12,
> dle0
> fwohci_arrs_input: no listner
> fwohci_buf_pktget: desc 16, off 1084, req 4096, res 3012, len 4, avail 0
> fwohci_buf_input: no input for 3
> fwohci_event_thread: intmask 00000002 RespTxComp
> fwohci_at_done: desc 24 (3)
> 02000010 00000000 00000000 000031d6 00025970 ffc00020 00000000 00200000
> 103c0020 00cb3c00 00000000 84510000
>
> sbp2_login_ans: (addr): (0x80053d4c)
>
> sbp2_free_orb:(addr):(0x8005575c)
> Freeing orb at addr: 0x00000000f0010008 status_rec: 0x0
> sbpscsi_timeout
> Called sbp2_abort
> ________Dmesg________
>
> I have seen some mails regarding this chip on linux mailing lists, but i m
> unable to apply it with netbsd code?
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1458191
> --
> Regards,
> Rishabh Kumar Goel
> Software Engineer
> SoCrates Software India Pvt. Ltd.
> Bangalore
>
> Scanned by SecureSynergy VirusScreen Service.
> For more information log on to : http://www.securesynergyonline.com or http://www.securesynergy.com
>