Marshall Rose writes:

>yeah, after playing with that for a while. i decided to run apache with
>u/g mailman:mailman...

I've encountered the same problems a while back when trying to set
up mailman+apache.  I wonder what the best solution here is.
Running the entire apache as mailman:mailman probably isn't so
desirable.  Running mailman (and its databases) as www:www is
neither.  Perhaps Manuel's choice of running the mailman scripts
setgid isn't that bad?

-- 
  Matthias Buelow;  mkb@{mukappabeta.de,informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de}