Subject: Re: sane-backends-1.0.12 vs. USB scanners
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <email@example.com>
Date: 08/04/2003 14:30:06
In article <20030803151723.GA169@bjan.net>,
"Bruce J.A. Nourish" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> It would be handy to have ktrace output to see exactly what was going on.
Something tries to open "/dev/usb0" to "/dev/usb9". Later the configuration
file "plustek.conf" is read but there are no more attempts to open
anything in "/dev".
> One thing I will say is that (if this is the same libusb as found on
> Linux) libusb directly accesses the USB bus, circumventing the whole
> /dev/uscanner* buisness.
It worked with an older version of "libusb" and/or "sane-backends".
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/