And if you assign that IP to rtk1 you should be able to ping 192.168.0.3 ...
Routing could help, but, the kernel must be able to determine the right
interface to get to a special computer.
A bridge normally is passive in the meaning of only repeating ethernet
frames from on interface to the other.
I think there is no easy solution to this point as what you like to do is
not intended to be done by a bridge (
which should normally be unvisible)
.
Sorry, can't help you.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Juha K Kallio" <bunnyh@psychedelic.baana.suomi.net>
To: <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: IP on bridge interface?


> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens
wrote:
> > You can assign a IP adress to one of the interfaces which are part of
your
> > bridge.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Juha K Kallio" <bunnyh@psychedelic.baana.suomi.net>
> > To: <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:38 AM
> > Subject: IP on bridge interface?
> >
> >
> > > Why I cannot assign an IP-address for a bridge interface in NetBSD? I
am
> > trying to network three machines by installing two
> > > NICs in one, and making it a bridge. This was possible with linux, but
> > NetBSD doesn't seem to allow assigning an IP-address
> > > for the bridge. Is there any other way to do this? Assigning an IP to
one
> > of the NICs obviously doesn't work, and I want to
> > > have all the machines on the same network.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> I have tried that. bridge0 consists of rtk0 and rtk1. If I assign
192.168.0.1 to rtk0, I can only ping 192.168.0.2, which
> is connected to rtk0. 192.168.0.3(rtk1) just timeouts. Do I have to set up
some special routes?
>
>