Subject: Re: ICE CD recorder
To: Christian Biere <email@example.com>
From: Wojciech Puchar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/13/2003 09:30:02
> > > Try dd with various blocksizes instead.
> > no that's not pipes
> Either, I misunderstand you or you misunderstood me. I meant something
> like this:
understood and that's why i say this. dd with 64k works fine.
> dd if=file bs=4k|cdrecord -dummy ...
> For me that's 2-4x faster (depending on the blocksize) than
> cat file|cdrecord -dummy ...
> I don't see why these aren't pipes. I would also suggest to use -waiti
> for cdrecord. The fifosize shouldn't be too large either because then
> cdrecord seems to spend more CPU with filling the fifo than writing to
> the burner.