Subject: Re: should bind9 have a chroot option?
To: Charles Blundell <email@example.com>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/07/2003 21:55:03
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:24:08PM +0100, Charles Blundell wrote:
> on Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Steve Bellovin wrote:
> > named has a chroot option. However, the bind9 package does
> > not. I would think that it should.
> If you mean the rc.d script, I had this lying around, based on
The only problem is that the bind9 named can't chgrp like our named
can, seemingly because they'd already used up the option letter we
added for it! A trivial annoyance, but one that we should address.