Subject: basic release questions
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+nbsd@2003.snew.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 12/22/2002 11:16:31
Feel free to trim this when replying.
Just getting familiar with the habits and such of NetBSD.
I've been running 1.5.3 for a bit and -current on a machine
that hasn't been unpacked yet.
On what basis do NetBSD releases occur? 1.6 just came out, but
1.5.3 was a while ago, and 1.5 was LONG LONG ago.
How do you keep reasonably up to date without going into the
mire and risks that come with -current?
Releases are done by the BSDs for different reasons:
- OpenBSD releases every 6 months, like clock work.
Has some plusses, has some minus.
Security patches come out for 1 year, then that
release is abandoned.
- FreeBSD releases updates for the current and previous
major trees fairly regularly, with features targetting
and planned for the next major release. I get an update
to a minor release every 4-8 months. But I can get fixes
for machines running 18 month old code bases.
A -stable is maintained and you can pretty easily keep
a system working with low risk by keeping that.
- BSD/OS is being driven into more obscurity by a company
that doesn't really seem to know why people use BSD/OS.
NetBSD seems to do a release on very long timelines.
-current is always a little dangerous, but the previous
release can start to get very old.
I ask because I have some machines out there that won't get full
updates every 2 months or even every year. They are sometimes far
away; sometimes they are embedded appliance type things in production
and require a screwdriver to make changes. Yes, things like SSH
can get fixed when needed (what a summer - ssh&ssl&bind), but the
kernel and userland can't get updated without a big pain.
Thanks,
chuck