Subject: Re: is 1.6 updated...
To: Mike Cheponis <mac@Wireless.Com>
From: Brian A. Seklecki <email@example.com>
Date: 11/23/2002 17:08:43
on Sat, 23 Nov 2002 @ 12:55am (-0800), Mike Cheponis wrote:
MC> ... to take into account the recent security fixes?
Yes that patch got pulled up into -rnetbsd-1-6 branch. If you want "stable",
just track that branch. The best thing to do is subscribe to source-change@
and then procmail out anything with the [netbsd-1-6] in the subject into a
special folder and closely monitor changes and updates that concern you.
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:23:40 +0200 (EET)
From: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: CVS commit: [netbsd-1-6] basesrc/libexec/ftpd
Module Name: basesrc
Committed By: tron
Date: Fri Nov 1 08:23:40 UTC 2002
basesrc/libexec/ftpd [netbsd-1-6]: cmds.c
Pull up revision 1.19 (requested by itojun in ticket #942):
Turns out that our implementation of STAT wasn't RFC 959 compliant.
This version is now RFC 959 compliant, using a patch adapted from one
sent in by email@example.com
openbsd libexec/ftpd/ftpd.c revision 1.69.
(see RFC959 page 36)
To generate a diff of this commit:
cvs rdiff -r1.16 -r184.108.40.206 basesrc/libexec/ftpd/cmds.c
Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
copyright notices on the relevant files.
MC> And, in general, are the "stable" releases changed once they are released,
MC> so that if somebody just downloads the latest release, the fixes are
MC> included? Or does one need to apply the proper patches?
MC> Thanks -Mike