>>> David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk> 20/06/2002 03:38:09 >>>

> It seems that su(1) requires a broken (non posix conformant) getopt(3),
> however it doesn't require one that is as broken as the old code!
. . .
> OTOH maybe su's command line parsing should work with a conformant
> getopt routine...

Thanks for the patch.  I'll try it out this afternoon.

Richard.