On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:01:48PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > NetBSD/i386 based.
> >
> > My experience in tunnels is limited to ipv6/gif tunnels
> 
> my experience of ipv6/gif tunnels is (while it's short experience) that
> they Just Works (TM) :)
> 
> i just read man, asked few questions on netbsd-users, did what i wanted
> and it works.
> 
> > What kind of tunnel is better for this case?
> >
> 
> gif. remember you can tunnel ipv4 over ipv4 too.
> 
> with ipv4 only use vtun - similar functionality but with excryption and
> compression.

Why only vtun? I'm using a v4 only IPSec/IKE/racoon connection to
a Cisco router everyday and it works just fine on the gif interface.
I've got compression and encryption and reasonably good performance
on an old 200MHz K6.
 
-- jay
 
> unfortunately NetBSD tun device doesn't work with IPv6, so vtun does not
> too.