Jason R Thorpe said:

>There is a clear separation of the two sets of functionality.
>
>Now, take a look at the code in NetBSD.  You'll see a similar separation
>of functionality ... UFS for the high-level Unix file system stuff, FFS
>and LFS providing the on-disk storage support.

Okay. So what is the fs with ACL support going to be called? If you remember,
from a number of months ago, there is someone porting the ACL based stuff
from FreeBSD to NetBSD.

-- 
Rick Kelly  rmk@rmkhome.com  www.rmkhome.com