Subject: Re: Terse device names
To: None <netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
From: Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus20020419T205025@wsrcc.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 04/19/2002 21:17:24
optimus@canit.se (Iggy Drougge) writes:
> Why are BSD device names so terse? 

Tradition?  I guess nobody remembers the old pcc 6 (8 ???) character
limit for C variable and routine names. (*) If you prepended long
device names to the routine names you wouldn't have many characters
left to describe the variable or routine itself.

ethl3o()
ethl3c()
ethl3r()
ethl3w()
ethl3s()

-wolfgang

* Technically the names could be longer than N letters, but they had
to be unique in the first N.
-- 
       Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus@dailyplanet.wsrcc.com>
		    http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
Coming soon: GPS mapping tools for Open Systems. http://www.gnomad-mapping.com/