Subject: RE: [open-source] Sun to start charging for Star Office
To: Richard Rauch <rauch@rice.edu>
From: Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 04/05/2002 21:18:03
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Richard Rauch wrote:
>> >> No, I would argue that Mr. St. Hilaire is taking a position which while
>> >> quite possibly incorrect is relevant to the thread. And it certainly
>> >> seems that your objection to his voicing his position is based on the
>> >> content of that position. Am I misunderstanding?
>> >
>> >At least insofar as my posts are concerned, yes.
>>
>> OK, please enlighten me. When you say
>>
>> > Stephane: This isn't an appropriate forum for being an MS apologist.
>>
>> what _are_ you saying? I would certainly interpret this as saying
>> ``agreeing with MS is not acceptable on this list'', and I think most
>> readers would do the same...
>
>I said exactly what I said. You can always take what I say and interpret
>it as something different, if that pleases you. If you can't detect the
>difference in tone and meaning between the quote and the paraphrase that
>you supplied, then please refrain from paraphrasing me.
Again, what _are_ you saying then? The plain meaning of what you say is
pretty clear, as is the interpretation most readers have ascribed to it.
I have to admit I'm pretty stumped trying to find another
interpretation. Maybe you'd care to fill me in?
>This also isn't an appropriate place to discuss a knee injury that I had
>some ten years ago, or whether my nose itches, or how the TRS-80 did
>graphics. A few short comments aren't a problem, but if people started
>seeing long tirades about my nose, that would not be appropriate to the
>list. It doesn't matter whether you are for or against my nose (or its
>itching). If I disregarded that, I would expect to be directed to look up
>an alt. newsgroup for itchy noses.
Except that you didn't object to Mr. St.Hilaire's _topic_ (or to any of
the other posters on that subject. You objected to his _position_. And
I don't think that's a good idea.
But that's fine. Continuing to carry on this way is even sillier than
the original thread had become...
- --
Jim Wise
jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8rlrfN71lEcOYcw4RAqIvAJ9COhHgaBLO6FZqYC7eJOVby0t8XgCfcQFk
/HiW3LJ1qXSfV7wF3XsvmFo=
=LxX1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----