Wojciech Puchar wrote:

> 
> do you think they are well-designed responsive desktop?
> i don't know what responsive mean to you but for me think that takes >64MB
> RAM and kills >100 MIPS CPU is exactly opposite to "responsive".

not yet, but I think that's one of the goals. Consider also that 
most users buying a machine today would get something that would 
run those at speeds sufficient to make them feel responsive, not 
the clapped-out old stuff I have laying around. The best I can 
throw at these is 700MHz  . . . ..

-- 
Paul Beard
8040 27th Ave NE
Seattle WA 98115
206 529 8400

Some people live life in the fast lane.  You're in oncoming traffic.