Subject: Re: XFS or JFS on NetBSD?
To: Aaron J. Grier <agrier@poofygoof.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: netbsd-users
Date: 02/21/2002 19:22:14
[ On Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 15:12:50 (-0800), Aaron J. Grier wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: XFS or JFS on NetBSD?
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:01:15AM +0100, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> > Is it at all possible to coerce SGI's XFS or IBM's JFS to work on
> > NetBSD, seeing as they're available for Linux?
> 
> because NetBSD already has LFS?  ;)

I really don't think you can blindly replace XFS with LFS -- they're
very different critters on the inside and I wouldn't be at all surprised
if they behaved very differently under an identical usage load (just as
LFS behaves very differently from FFS under some usage loads).  JFS
might be closer to LFS in some ways, but it has many different
capabilities too.

-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  <gwoods@acm.org>;  <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;  <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>